Toy Story 3
As a Pixar fan, I was really happy when they resolved their contentious lawsuit with Disney and were given free and complete reign over Disney Animation. I would not have been able to support a Disney-only driven Toy Story 3. Pixar doesn’t put out anything they don’t lovingly and arduously create with their full attention. That Disney version of Toy Story 3 would’ve been a betrayal to the Pixar legend and not at all created on the same caliber as other Pixar movies. Last fall, I saw the special double feature of Toy Story and Toy Story 2 in 3D. While I had had fond memories of the movies from the first time around, I was still thrilled to my core by how awesome these movies were.
Toy Story 3 lived up to my incredibly high expectations. I saw it in IMAX 3D. All enhancements were taken advantage of by the Pixar team. The visuals sparkle with joy and detail. The story is charming, engaging and universal. It is a great end to a now classic trilogy. Having it end with Andy having to decide what to do with his toys/exploring the fate of his beloved toys as he prepares to leave home for college, is a brilliant move. The theater was sold out with an audience heavy on the little ones but still ranging across all ages. The movie appeals to all.
Winter’s Bone
I didn’t know much about Winter’s Bone except it was set in the Ozarks and that it had a lot of critical acclaim. I was blown away. From beginning to end I was captivated. It’s based on a book by the same name, Winter’s Bone by Daniel Woodrell. After seeing the movie, I’m interested in reading the book. However, I think the filmmaker Debra Granik and her cohorts made a great adaptation. The story follows a 17-year old girl, Ree Dolly, who is the caretaker of her younger siblings and incapacitated mother. The kicker is her father is an AWOL criminal, part of the extended family’s meth ring. Ree’s family is destitute, living on the kindness of strangers and her scrappiness. The extended family doesn’t look any better off although they offer help in their own unique way to Ree as she searches for her father in order to preserve what little the family has. It’s a mystery, drama and thriller that reminded me of Justified, Breaking Bad and The Sopranos. I am a big fan of all three shows so Winter’s Bone was a big hit with me. John Hawkes shines as Ree’s uncle Teardrop. He is miserable and terrifying but full of regret and loyalty. I recognized his face from Eastbound and Down but his dramatic work was nothing like his character on that comedy. It was a pleasant surprise that Debra Granik, John Hawkes and singer Marideth Sisco conducted a Q&A afterwards. Marideth Sisco spoke a lot to the verisimilitude of the story to life in the Ozarks while Debra Granik made it clear that the meth culture is a just a piece of the culture relayed by the book Winter’s Bone and not a generalization of life in the Ozarks. It definitely felt like a slice of a particular life. The bluegrass music was very appealing and seemed like a light in a dark lifestyle. The soundtrack is going to be made available and is worth investigating.
Shakespeare in the Park: Merchant of Venice
Waiting forever for free vouchers for tickets to Shakespeare in the Park is a quintessential New York experience. It’s oddly labor-intensive in that passive way. You just have to awaken the nerd in you to motivate to plan it right. Think of when people lined up for Star Wars Ep 1. It’s like that but in a different way. The intensity of people’s motivation is also influenced by the star factor. Last year, Anne Hathaway made her theater debut in 12th Night. This year, Al Pacino is reprising his role as Shylock as he performed in the movie Merchant of Venice a short while back. So I trekked out the morning of the show extra early knowing people would be motivated to stand/sit in line for hours on end to see Al live. Anyway, my efforts worked out. It looked overcast but the weather cooperated. The set was interesting. The coolest part was sitting outside, watching the play as the day went from evening to night. It was actually the debut of Merchant of Venice because the first show had been rained out so the cast was palpably excited to perform it for an audience. We were the lucky recipients of this great energy. Al Pacino was astounding as one would expect. The actual storyline is tough to process. Shylock gets berated and abused by almost every character in the play. I can’t believe Merchant of Venice was performed as a comedy during Shakespeare’s time. The comedy part is certainly a different play. I think the Public Theater interpreted the play to be a moral tale about intolerance and persecution more in line with modern thinking. But the undertones of racism are still there. It’s hard to reconcile the gravity of Shylock’s tale with the levity put into the other storyline. Nevertheless, it’s an impressive effort by the Public Theater. They are performing in repertory this summer alternating performances of Merchant of Venice and A Winter’s Tale. So my next endeavor is to see A Winter’s Tale.
Also, the other interesting aspect of seeing Shakespeare live is hearing phrases that are so famous we hardly know their origin at this point or their most famous usages. My brain doesn’t necessarily hold on to every word I read in high school English. So watching live performers say the words is almost rattling. Let me think of what stood out.
-All the glitters is not gold.
-I hold the world but as the world, Gratiano,-
A stage, where every man must play a part;
And mine a sad one.
-In the twinkling of an eye…
-Love is blind…
The most famous are:
If you prick us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?
And of course “a pound of flesh.”
This is a famous phrase. I will just quote myself below:
Added 10/04:Origin of “a pound of flesh”
Here is a more thorough explanation of the origin of the phrase “a pound of flesh” which may be traced back to the Merchant of Venice which was written in the late 1500’s. Shakespeare was thought to have based Merchant partly on a parable about a creditor (with issues) who demands a pound of flesh as payment.
Antonio is the merchant in question who is, at the beginning of the tale, awaiting his ships to return full of merchandise. He is also quick to lend money to his friend Bassanio whenever asked. So, to help Bassanio get the girl of his dreams, Portia, Antonio gets a loan from Shylock knowing that shortly his ships will return and he’ll be flush again. Shylock does not like Antonio because he has not been kind or respectful to him in the past (Antonio has spit at Shylock and called him “dog”) and they are sort of business rivals. Both lend out money but Shylock lends money with high interest while Antonio doesn’t ask for any interest at all. So, Shylock will only lend him the dough with the condition that if it is not paid back in time, Antonio will owe him, Shylock, a pound of flesh.
Shylock says, “…if he should break this day, what should I gain by the exaction of the forfeiture? A pound of man’s flesh, taken from a man, is not so estimable, nor profitable neither, as the flesh of mutton or beef. I say, to buy his favour I offer this friendship: if he will take it, so; if not, adieu.”
Of course, it turns out that Antonio’s business goes bust and Shylock demands his pound of flesh. Even when Bassanio offers to pay back the debt, Shylock insists on Antonio fulfilling the debt himself. There is a trial, and Portia, disguised as a man, acts as Antonio’s lawyer. She is able to lessen the debt to a pound of flesh as long as there’s no blood taken – an impossibility. Also, it is determined that a pound of flesh could not be taken without taking Antonio’s life so Shylock is charged with attempted murder. He gets off but not without having to convert religions (from Judaism to Christianity) and give away all of his money.
So that leaves us once again with the phrase “a pound of flesh” referring to the heavy price of something and also thinking about how both Shylock and Antonio are flawed. But that’s a whole other essay for another time and place.
Added 4/05:
The source: More about the origin of “A Pound of Flesh”
How I came across it: Many thanks to Deborah Soloway for the following contribution from 3/05:
“I work in the field of bankruptcy law and teach to paralegal students. Our textbook, Basic Bankruptcy Law for Paralegals (5th ed. 2004) David L. Buchbinder (Aspen Publishers), contains a short history of bankruptcy law and a discussion of historic systems. Roman republican law allowed a group of creditors to exhibit a debtor in the forum for three days and, if his debts were not redeemed/paid by his friends & family, divide him up into multiple pieces in satisfaction of the debts. There is also evidence that creditors could divide up a corpse and effectively hold the pieces for ransom, since Roman religious practice required the body to remain whole to enter the afterlife. I haven’t read the source material cited by Buchbinder, but I know one of the authors as an able scholar.
I wonder if this might be the original significance of the “pound of flesh”?
Note: I don’t know. But it seems worth noting for further thought and research. Thanks again for letting me post your comment!
Tweet This Post