Let me quickly review what I’ve been up to and what I’ve been thinking.
1) Saw Akeelah and the Bee partly because Armond White loved it. For the most part I thought it was sweet, very fairytale-like and feel-good all in a positive way. But I did notice from the get-go that the Asians were vilified. This movie was all about how people are not always what they seem…except Asians, I guess. The girl playing Akeelah was good.
2) Speaking of which, I saw Angela Bassett in the audience when I went to see The History Boys which I loved. She looked great (at 48). Someone asked me if she had her twins or was it through a surrogate. It was through a surrogate in case you were also wondering. She went to Yale Drama School and is a theater actor so I can see why the play was something she wanted to see. Anyway, I loved the portrayals of Posner and Scripps. They were among the strongest performances. All the teachers were good. Two Harry Potter actors were in it - Harry Potter’s uncle and the French headmistress. Loved the way music was integrated. Loved the staging – the use of video. Enjoyed hearing snippets of Just Can’t Get Enough by Depeche Mode in between scenes. I give History Boys a high recommend. EDIT: I realized I didn’t say anything about the actual play for those who are unfamiliar. It’s set in a high school in Northern England during the mid 1980’s and these boys have finished all of their high school requirements except for their college entrance exam. The play is relatable even if you don’t quite know what A-levels and O-levels are like me. I mean, I sort of know from friends who went through that system. Anyway, the ensemble cast works. The writing is tight. It has been a critical success in England and has already been filmed in movie version with the same cast and same director. So while I will miss the excellent staging of it, I look forward to the film version.
Edit #2 (5/13/06): I really liked something I heard in this interview I saw on NY1’s On Stage with Roma Torre. She was speaking with Richard Griffiths (Hector) and Samuel Barnett (Posner). She asked them what it was like to be on Broadway with this show after 2 years with it with the same people. Richard Griffiths said that when they were in Australia just before New York, they were performing to an appreciative audience but the place was a wasteland where there was no other theater. He told the boys, wait until New York. This is what we’ve been working towards. You’ll be surrounded by theater, surrounded by actors, surrounded by people who know and appreciate theater on a different level. Then Roma Torre asked Samuel Barnett what it was like to be in New York and he said it was everything Richard Griffiths said it would be and more. He said it was overwhelming and a fantastic experience. I just liked how it put a different perspective on what it’s like from the actor’s point of view and not just from a jaded theater-goer’s view. It made me really happy for them and their success.
3) Yes, I’ve been on a theater roll. I went to see Awake and Sing by Clifford Odets. He wrote it in 1935 and it’s more or less set in 1935. He’s known for his kitchen sink realism – one of the first playwrights to focus on regular folks in a regular way. It’s about a Jewish family in the Bronx during the Depression, in between wars. I was drawn to it because Mark Ruffalo was in it. He was great. He had all the best lines. As I’ve said, a long time ago, I saw Mark Ruffalo here in NYC on stage in This is Our Youth which I loved. I didn’t even realize that Ben Gazzara was in Awake and Sing. It was cool to see him – this John Cassevetes actor. The girl from Six Feet Under was good too. It was ironic that Odets wrote this play for the people about the people and here we were sitting in not inexpensive seats in 2006. The 1930’s American vernacular was quaint to hear. I don’t know about the play being terrifically written but it was decent. I think the acting was better than the actual play. But I liked the historical element. It debuted in 1935 in the same theater it’s playing in now – the Belasco I think.
4) Then there was Faith Healer by Brian Friel. It starred Ralph Fiennes, Cherry Jones and Ian McDiarmid. In short, I didn’t really get it and I didn’t really care. But I still greatly enjoyed Ian “I’m the Emperor in Star Wars” McDiarmid’s performance. He had the best written role or something. Ralph Fiennes was amazing in his performance. I just didn’t care for the writing. Sorry Mr. Friel. I’m sure he doesn’t care what I think. Cherry Jones was impressive but I think her part was the weakest. So the acting was great but I wasn’t that into the play. Oh, but I was excited to see Peter Bogdonovich in the audience.
5) I had this nice thing happen where I decided I wouldn’t get tickets to the Tribeca Film Festival this year but felt that I’d be into seeing The Promise for free. And lo and behold, I won tickets to see The Promise at the Tribeca Film Festival. Chen Kaige was there and gave a lengthy, informative introduction. He said it took a year and a half to finish the special effects and he said it was hard for him as it was all new to him. He said he will use far less effects in his next movie. We learned that his wife, Hong Chen, plays the Goddess in the movie. I wouldn’t have known that otherwise. I actually liked the story much more than I thought I would. It was a fairytale from the get-go. Visually, it was great. I heard there have been complaints about everyone’s phonetically spoken Mandarin. But as I don’t know Mandarin, I was spared any aural discomfort in this regard. I felt like the acting was not that strong. They were all good-looking. But there was a lack of depth somewhere somehow. I would give it a B/B- maybe. Anyway, my somewhat middling review matters little. This movie, the biggest budget Chinese movie ever, has already been the biggest box office smash in China ever. I think it will do great in the rest of Asia. In America, I think people will be turned off by the subtitles. Also, the martial arts are less authentic and more special effects generated. So that audience (the more hardcore action, especially martial arts audience) will not be attracted to it. But I definitely scored by being able to sate my curiosity about the movie for free!
EDIT: I just read Armond White’s rave review of The Promise and had to mention it here. Time Out NY hated it. I’m in between. Armond says:
With The Promise, Chen Kaige joins cinema’s archetypal visionaries from Murnau to Kurosawa, Bertolucci to Boorman. He’s made an action movie rich with adult meaning and paradox—as when the Princess pauses and kisses the General, a kiss that gives orgasmic rest. Chen commits to genre refinement; he shows exactly what you need to see with no excess—but with sudden shifts where dreamlike events take on a realism of supernal clarity. The Promise is a corrective to the HK/Peter Jackson trend where action and speed are abused. Even more, it’s Chen’s pledge to preserve what makes movies great by visually revving-up our subconscious. As Kunlun, the liberated slave, is told: “To achieve real speed you must discover your heart’s desire.”
6) Six? I’ve sort of lost track. I just made it to the Edvard Munch exhibit at MOMA in this final week. If you live in NYC or have been visiting recently, you will be familiar with the hullabaloo surrounding this exhibit. I made two attempts at seeing the exhibit after waiting far too long to get there. The first time, I didn’t allot enough time to stand for 45 minutes in the “Buy Tickets” line. The second time, I already had my ticket and only had to stand in the “Ticket holders” line for 15 minutes. That was painless. I did the audio tour. That was totally worth it (free with museum entrance fee). Was the Munch exhibit worth the trouble? Yes. I’m glad I made all the effort it took to follow through. I liked all of his woodcutting prints. He had a very full artistic life. Munch actually experienced success during his lifetime and seemed happy about it. Well, let’s not overstate it; he had moments of happiness in his life. You can listen to the audio tour on the MOMA website if you are so inclined.
So those are the highlights. Oh, I wanted to say a few words about Brick. It was pretty good. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is a seasoned and strong actor. He held my interest and made me care about what was going on. Next up on my movie list are MI:3, Prairie Home Companion and The Da Vinci Code – because I’m a sucker for blockbuster movies.
Tweet This Post