The Pop Culture Addict’s Blog

The Pop Culture Addict’s Guide to Finishing a Dissertation

"Pssh! I'm not a henchman, I'm Dr. Horrible. I have a Ph.D. in horribleness!" -Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog
October 28th, 2009

Ray Browne, 87, Founder of Pop-Culture Studies, Dies

I didn’t know of Ray Browne but a fellow Pop Culture Addict sent me this link. RIP, Ray Browne.

From the New York Times:

October 28, 2009
Ray Browne, 87, Founder of Pop-Culture Studies, Dies
By MARGALIT FOX

Ray B. Browne, who more than four decades ago founded the academic discipline of popular-culture studies, and who in the years that followed presided over the somewhat unlikely, often uneasy and almost always stimulating marriage between the ivory tower and Mickey Mouse, Madonna and Michael Jackson, among many other subjects, died on Oct. 22 at his home in Bowling Green, Ohio. He was 87.

His niece Barbara Moran confirmed the death, saying it was from natural causes.

At his death, Professor Browne was a distinguished university professor emeritus at Bowling Green State University, where he had taught from 1967 to 1992. A folklorist and literary scholar who specialized in Twain and Melville, he founded the university’s department of popular culture, the first such academic department in the country, in 1973.

The news media often credited Professor Browne with having coined the term “popular culture,” but according to the Oxford English Dictionary, the expression goes back at least to 1854, when it appeared in print in The Defiance Democrat in Ohio. But it is fair, and entirely fitting, to say that Professor Browne popularized the phrase.

For decades a highly visible public intellectual, Professor Browne was quoted often in major newspapers and profiled in People magazine. He wrote nearly a dozen books and edited more than 40 others.

Among the titles he edited are “Lincoln-Lore: Lincoln in the Popular Mind” (1974); “The Defective Detective in the Pulps” (1983; with Gary Hoppenstand); “Forbidden Fruits: Taboos and Tabooism in Culture” (1984); and “The Gothic World of Stephen King” (1987; with Mr. Hoppenstand). All were published by the Popular Press, which Professor Browne founded in 1970 with his wife, Pat Browne. Inaugurated at Bowling Green, the Popular Press is now an imprint of the University of Wisconsin Press.

Popular culture casts a wide net. It takes in dime novels, tabloid newspapers and TV weathermen; the Monkees, the Muppets and “The Love Boat”; T-shirts and G-strings; baseball cards and tarot cards; infomercials, Chatty Cathy dolls and needlepoint pillows; Bob Hope, Tiny Tim, Archie Bunker and Erica Jong; Tupperware, cream pies and Spam (both kinds); hood ornaments, Harlequin romances, “Leave It to Beaver” and a great deal else. For some, this ecumenicalism is part of the field’s appeal. For others, it is precisely what makes it seem unfit for scholarly consumption.

Professor Browne was often called upon to defend the honor of his discipline, the object of wide derision when it was begun and the subject of renewed attacks by traditionalists amid the canon wars of the 1980s. (The two-credit course on roller coasters, rides included, that Bowling Green offered in 1978 came in for a particular drubbing by scholars and the media.)

“I’ve been criticized for three things,” Professor Browne told The Chicago Tribune in 1988. “Wasting taxpayer money, embarrassing my colleagues and corrupting youth.”

His reply to his critics was simple and eloquent. “Popular culture is the voice of democracy, democracy speaking and acting, the seedbed in which democracy grows,” he said in an interview in 2002 with Americana: The Journal of American Popular Culture (1900 to Present). “It is the everyday world around us: the mass media, entertainments and diversions. It is our heroes, icons, rituals, everyday actions, psychology and religion — our total life picture. It is the way of living we inherit, practice and modify as we please, and how we do it. It is the dreams we dream while asleep.”

Ray Broadus Browne was born in Millport, Ala., on Jan. 15, 1922. His father was a banker, but the bank closed after the crash of 1929, and the family was soon lining their shoes with cardboard, his niece said. As a teenager, Ray picked cotton for 10 cents a day. In World War II, he served in Europe with an Army artillery unit, but often landed in the stockade because, as he later wrote, “I did not have enough ‘Sirs’ in my vocabulary.”

After receiving a bachelor’s degree in English from the University of Alabama in 1943, he earned a master’s in English and comparative literature from Columbia in 1947 and a doctorate in English and folklore from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 1956. Before joining the Bowling Green faculty, Professor Browne taught at the Universities of Nebraska and Maryland and Purdue University.

In 1967, the year he arrived at Bowling Green, Professor Browne founded both its Center for the Study of Popular Culture and The Journal of Popular Culture, the field’s first scholarly journal. He later founded the Popular Culture Association and the American Culture Association (the two now operate jointly) and The Journal of American Culture.

Today, courses on pop-cultural subjects are offered at colleges and universities throughout the United States. The department at Bowling Green, which awards B.A. and M.A. degrees, remains the only one in the country dedicated specifically to the field.

Professor Browne’s first wife, Olwyn Orde, died in a car accident in 1964, along with a son, Rowan. He is survived by two other sons from his first marriage, Glenn and Kevin; his second wife, the former Alice Maxine Matthews, known as Pat; a daughter, Alicia Browne, from his marriage to Ms. Matthews; and three grandchildren.

With his wife Pat, Professor Browne started a major archive at Bowling Greene now called the Browne Popular Culture Library. The couple also edited The Guide to United States Popular Culture (Popular Press, 2001), a 1,010-page reference work touching on everything from “The A-Team” to zydeco.

Of the guide’s 1,600 entries, one in particular was a favorite of Professor Browne’s. It was the page-long article, written by him, on the subject of wallpaper.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/education/28browne.html

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
October 26th, 2009

Modern Family & Cougar Town

Modern Family
I’ve been thinking about writing about the new shows I’m watching this season. I think I’ll start with ABC’s Modern Family and Cougar Town. Don’t worry if you’ve missed any eps because thanks to modern technology, they are all available at the ABC site and on Hulu for free and if you want to watch them on the go, they are on iTunes. I recommend both highly. They are funny, real and only 22 minutes an episode. Modern Family is shot documentary style like The Office but the purpose is never revealed. I’m willing to accept that it is an ongoing documentation of a modern family life in America. I don’t need an explanation. The casting is perfect. At first, it seems like the characters might be broadly drawn but then each one reveals quirks and insecurities that make them endearing. I love all the kids too especially Manny/Rico Rodriguez, son of Gloria/Sofia Vergara and the step-son of Jay/Ed O’Neill. Since we are five eps out, I’m going to go ahead and say that the surprise at the end of the pilot is that the three featured families (a nuclear family, a same sex couple that just adopted an Asian baby and the older, wealthy man married to a bombshell) are related. I actually didn’t see this twist coming and it was really fun to watch it unfold. It’s also fun to follow the showrunner Steve Levitan on Twitter. I could really say something positive about each actor but I’ll just say that they make a warm, funny cast and they deliver every time.

Cougar Town
A fellow Pop Culture Addict won’t watch this show because the premise is off-putting. I see how that might be but again, this show is very real and it makes me laugh consistently. I am a fan of Scrubs, also by Bill Lawrence. And Courtney Cox has shown versatility beyond Friends in the Scream movies and that show I didn’t watch but got critical acclaim (Dirt). I’m thinking that she, Christa Miller and Bill Lawrence hit it off when she was on Scrubs. Frankly, the second I saw Dan Byrd, the kid from the short-lived Aliens in America, playing Travis, son of Courtney Cox’ character on screen, I was sold. He is just a funny guy and he’s fantastic on Cougar Town. To be honest, I first watched 10 Things I Hate About You because the sister from Aliens in America plays Kat. But it’s turned out to be a decent show. I’d like to see Raja/Adhir Kalyan in something good too. Apparently he’s in Rules of Engagement which I don’t currently watch but I might have to check it out just for him. Anyway, I digress. Courtney Cox plays a recently divorced woman, going on 5 months, with a teenage son and an ex-husband who still hangs out amicably. Her best friends are a funny Ellie/Christa Miller married to Andy/Ian Gomez (who I’ll always love in Felicity) and 20-something work colleague Laurie/Busy Philipps who was never better than as Kim Kelly on the awesome Freaks and Geeks. Yes, Courtney Cox dates a younger man, only one so far. But the comedy is believable. It’s not too farcical. There is one over-the-top cougar who gets to be the stereotype and say and do what is only funny because she gets the joke. The show is nicely balanced by the good-looking 40ish single male neighbor who dates a string of 20-something women and is never called a cougar or Jack Nicholson (badambump ching). It is implied that these two 40 year olds are actually a good match but haven’t gotten there yet. Still, it’s fun to watch him reluctantly become her friend. He conveniently owns the bar all the characters frequent in town. Cougar Town is well-written, well-acted and a nice surprise.

Breaking Dawn
Well, I finally finished reading the Twilight series. I have to say, it was entertaining. I don’t see what the fuss was about how Breaking Dawn was not on par with the other books. They are all written the same way. Stephenie Meyer had a concept; she thought it through and then delivered easily devoured populist YA lit. I guess easily devoured and populist is redundant but I do want to convey that I feel like she did it very successfully. She came up with characters that are appealing, have intrigue and are pretty different from anyone any of us knows (I am really glad she gave us a good dose of Jacob in Breaking Dawn). I would be happy to be able to write a good vacation read. I see the appeal of these books. They are easily digestible and have great romantic draw. There’s also the superhero/supernatural element. Maybe those are two separate elements. The idea of someone being devoted to you and also able to repel all danger is a nice fantasy, hello Lois Lane. That’s why Superman is a favorite character from his inception till now and beyond. The supernatural part is interesting because it brings up folklore, mystery and again, fantasy. Let me tell you, I do read books like King Leopold’s Ghost (well-written but far from uplifting) and what’s another hard to digest book… Fast Food Nation, a fairly easy book to read but constantly makes you think about everything – what you’re eating, what you’re buying, what you’re supporting, oh and Nickel and Dimed (easy to read but another one that puts you on alert about how bad it can get), but it’s nice to relax and not think about how we’re all doomed to poverty, poor health and greed and corruption to the point of losing respect for humanity. I’m perfectly content, for 700 pages or so, to think about how human-vampire love might work, reasons for why Edward might finally feel okay about turning Bella and how a werewolf-vampire alliance is good for the world.

The Lost Symbol
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: I think Dan Brown writes good pop fiction. He uses the same template for every book. He writes thrillers that are based in fact but then go off into fantasy. He seems to love research and does a thorough job of it no matter what area he decides to place his books. I haven’t really thought about why The Da Vinci Code was such a phenomenon. I guess people like conspiracy theories, he based the book in fact so that made it accessible, thrillers are fun to read, puzzles and code-breaking are a big draw. He knows how to write page-turners. It was just the right time and place. Anyway, I just finished reading The Lost Symbol. It was just like every one of his other books, satisfying, gripping, easy to read. He puts in a lot of factual information about relics in Washington DC as well as the Freemasons. Then he lets his imagination go wild. It’s pretty similar to The Da Vinci Code but seeing as that book made him rich, controversial and ingrained in pop culture, I don’t think it will be a detriment to sales. Also, he knows what his strengths are. He knows he’s good at writing short chapters with cliff-hanger endings. He knows people like puzzles. His research is thorough and deep enough that there’s a lot to delve into for a history buff. And it’s deep enough that for someone like me, I can read the book and feel like I learned something new but don’t need to investigate it further. I wonder if he’ll be allowed to deviate from the Robert Langdon character. Then again, all the other protoganists in his non-Langdon books are Langdon-like. There’s always some sort of symbology and code-breaking involved that could change the face of the world as we know it. Anyway, he’s found a formula that works. I certainly don’t begrudge him or Stephenie Meyer that.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
October 22nd, 2009

NYFF, Conclusion

Here are thoughts on the last round of movies at the New York Film Festival ‘09:

First off, I think I have to admit to myself that late movies during the week are just too late for me! I use up all my energy anticipating the movie. Then I struggle to stay awake during the movie no matter how riveting. Then I’m wired afterwards and stay up too late. Also, double features are another challenge I have to re-think. Back-to-back movies can be fun but when it’s back-to-back art movies, it gets dangerously close to actual work. Quentin Tarantino is a guy who likes to talk and has no filter so some of what he says I forget as soon as I hear it. But I remember he said when he was on the Jury at Cannes, he realized he had missed a lot of great movies. So every night he made himself watch an internationally-acclaimed dense, subtitled movie and he said he was glad he did it. But then one night he went to see the new Star Trek and it was such a relief to see a fun popcorn movie that was good in its own right but not mentally draining. Anyway, I can relate.

White Ribbon
Until I sat down to watch White Ribbon, I thought Michael Haneke was French. It turns out he is an Austrian living in France. This is relevant because White Ribbon is in German, not French like Cache or The Piano Teacher. Haneke is a filmmaker people seem to love despite the fact he aims to make you want to scratch your eyes out. When he introduced White Ribbon, he said, “I’ll say what I always say, have a disturbing screening.” I did not see Funny Games – his original or American re-make. But it did not call out to me at all. Clearly Haneke has a vision, stories and messages he feels compelled to convey. I am just not compelled to receive them. That said, I really liked White Ribbon. I liked it to the point that I would recommend it. But be forewarned that it is challenging to watch. It’s about sin and retribution. The child actors and adult actors are all strong. The kids really carry the movie. If you don’t believe them then you won’t get into the movie. It is in black and white which emphasizes the starkness of the story but the images are beautiful.

Around a Small Mountain
This felt like a movie someone would make later in life. I’m not sure if I would’ve had the same feeling if I didn’t know beforehand that it was made by 81 year old Jacques Rivette. At any rate, the characters are middle-aged and the movie is about guilt, regret and redemption. I liked how the themes were universal but the setting was unique. It takes place amongst a small French circus. It has a slow place so it’s not the movie to see if you’re feeling a little sleepy (ahem). But it has a pretty look.

Mother
I wasn’t sure what to expect of this movie. It was intense but perversely comical. It’s sad but warm. It has intrigue mixed in with broad humor. I like that Bong Joon-Ho branched out from The Host or rather, returned to the feel of what I’ve heard Memories of Murder is like. I haven’t seen it yet so I can’t speak to it specifically. I liked The Host a lot. It was funny, odd and kept my interest till the end. Mother had me guessing and guessing about how the murder unfolded and who was the culprit. But it’s almost besides the point. I mean, it’s a major plot point but it is primarily about family ties, genetic, cultural, situational. I took everything at face value but afterwards, I did find there was a lot of symbolism to analyze if I felt so inclined which I did for about 10 minutes.

White Material
I know Claire Denis is a talented filmmaker. I appreciate the serious nature of her stories and the beauty of her visuals. But her work is far from mainstream. By the time I got to White Material, I was ready for the next two movies I saw, Life During Wartime and Broken Embraces. They were just more familiar to me and took less work to watch. It was cool to see Jim Jarmusch sitting in front of me in the audience though. As his most recent movie, The Limits of Control, was paced quietly and langourously, I can see him appreciating the pace of Claire Denis. I liked The Limits of Control more though, not that they are about the same thing. I guess a common theme would be the impact of violence on an individual. I also enjoyed seeing Isaach de Bankolé in person. He looked extremely cool and I loved what he and William Nadylam said about the movie. (I am paraphrasing and speaking from my memories so don’t quote me.)They both responded to a comment about how unlikeable the characters were. They noted that each character was driven by what he or she felt was personally the right thing to do. They also spoke about how during wartime, things are not always clear cut. Claire Denis also said things along these lines. I guess overall, I enjoyed the discussion about White Material more than watching the actual movie.

Life During Wartime
This was an odd, melancholy movie but I expected no less from Todd Solondz. I found his idea of making something of a sequel to Happiness but only impressionistically rather than literally totally fascinating. It was perfect for the way my memory works. I didn’t need to see Philip Seymour Hoffman repeat his role here. I could watch Michael K. Williams (Omar from The Wire) perform and know who he was. By the way, he did a great job. This is far from a feel-good movie. It’s more dysfunctional than any non-Todd Solondz dysfunctional movie I can think of. But as far as his work goes, it’s par for the course. People are far from perfect and make terrible, horrible choices and mistakes that have deep impact on their family, friends, neighbors and complete strangers.

Broken Embraces
Penelope Cruz has found her groove recently. Her acting is so believable. Her naturally glamourous look is mesmerizing but also used so well by Pedro Almodovar. I really liked her in Woody Allen’s Vicky Cristina Barcelona. I can see why she is so appealing to characters in the movies due to her looks and intriguing persona but then she really fills out her characters so I can see why she makes mistakes and people around her make dangerous choices. Anyway, I had fun watching the story within a story within a story in Broken Embraces. It had the expected soap opera elements from an Almodovar movie that were presented in quirky, memorable ways as expected in an Almodovar movie. I didn’t mind the obvious and I didn’t mind the strange. All of the actors were compelling to watch.

Where the Wild Things Are
Where the Wild Things Are was feral and raw but refined in technique and execution. Spike Jonze did a great job of capturing the unruliness of childhood and the uncertainty of being young. Also, he successfully conveys that unbridled creativity in child’s play when the sky’s the limit. You’re not bound by convention yet. You just act because you are driven to want and need things but are only equipped as a kid to get them whether in play or in real life. People seem to really love the first 20 minutes or so before Max goes to the forest. It’s really tight and convincing. Once Max goes off into the land of the Wild Things, the movie gets loose and light on story. I loved the creatures and personally, I liked how they spoke. I’ve heard criticism that they come off too sophisticated and rational. But really, in the end, they are from Max’s imagination and can only reason as far as he can. Overall, I liked the movie. It was cool to see it in IMAX. I think it got a little meandering in the middle-to-end part because really, the source material was pretty light to begin with. So, I would see it again to see the visuals and take in the mood. I really enjoyed Spike Jonz’ documentary about Maurice Sendak. I think I watched it On-Demand on HBO.

Coco Before Chanel
I didn’t know much about the life of Coco Chanel so it was pretty much all a surprise to me as I watched Coco Before Chanel. She came from very modest, if not impoverished beginnings. Her natural talent for fashion was evident at an early age. She started off as a performer and seamstress. She did not have a particularly happy childhood or early adulthood it seems. Audrey Tatou did a fantastic job of playing Coco. It seems Coco was scrappy, a survivor and extremely gifted as a hat and clothing designer and maker. I would recommend this movie to anyone who enjoys bio flicks and/or fashion. Even if you’re just a fan of Audrey Tatou, that is enough of a reason to see this movie!

Juliet, Naked
I enjoyed reading Nick Hornby’s latest, Juliet, Naked. I wanted it to keep going but I guess that’s for me to figure out. I liked it as much as About a Boy and High Fidelity. That’s high praise from me as I loved those books. It’s told from the point of view of a woman, unusual for Nick Hornby although he just did it in How to Be Good. For me, it’s more successfully done in Juliet, Naked. In a way, it’s like High Fidelity but told from the point of view of the (ex-not ex)girlfriend. I want to see the movie An Education because Nick Hornby wrote it. Again, it’s from a female POV. The title, Juliet, Naked, reminds me of the Beatles’ album Let It Be… Naked. I wonder if that was the inspiration. However, in the case of The Beatles, Let It Be… Naked is a stellar album unlike Julie, Naked. Anyway, I wonder if it will become a movie. I read High Fidelity and About a Boy before they were movies and to be honest, I was too naive to even contemplate that they would become movies. But now I’ve learned so as I said, I wonder if Juliet, Naked has already been optioned. Probably. I think it will be good if it becomes a movie. It has a reclusive, talented musician, models, children, music geeks, American, a seaside town in England, fansites, e-mail, what else, the main highlight is it is written by Nick Hornby. Oh, the soundtrack could be fun to put together. But I am completely satisfied with the experience of reading the book.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
October 4th, 2009

NYFF Part 2

This was a light film fest week.

Trash Humpers
Harmony Korine’s Trash Humpers was an interesting experiment. Weird, but interesting. He said his goal was to make a movie that looked like it was a VHS tape that had been taped over repeatedly and then tossed in the trash and found. He used a VHS tape to make the movie to add to the authenticity of his project. It worked. He said he was tired of people saying something looked “beautiful” and wanted to achieve the same effects with more primitive techniques. I am one of those who said I find his work visually beautiful. The content is odd and not easily accessible. But the visuals are inspiring. So I took his comments personally. I have to say, I found this VHS project to have a very focused look. All the object-bashing was cathartic to watch. Maybe I saw deeper meanings in the images than Harmony Korine intended. But I’ll say what I thought: the trashing of bricks and various trash is primal; the young people wearing old people masks and acting young…well, when they were bashing old technology like tape decks, it made me think about the new pushing out the old. I have to admit I was exhausted that night and did fall asleep for a bit. So I think I missed a pivotal speech when someone explained everything within the film. I gathered this from a question after the movie. Anyway, I think I’ve seen most of his movies with a Q&A by him afterwards (such as Julien Donkey-Boy and Mister Lonely). This greatly enhances watching his movies for me. He is not as wacky as his reputation makes him sound. I don’t know about his personal life but from the Q&A’s, he comes off down-to-earth and genuine about his passion for film-making. He said that he didn’t enjoy everything involved with making Mister Lonely. He felt like there were too many people to answer to and while he loved working with the actors and actually making the movie, he said the overall experience was “hell on earth.” So he wanted to return to something simpler. Trash Humpers sure is simpler. It is filmed near his home in Nashville starring his wife and their friends. He is also in it. He said it only seemed right. Someone commented his movies are very American. He responded he thinks aside from Clint Eastwood, he is the most American film-maker out there. That got a big laugh. And he did say he liked Gran Torino a lot. What else was interesting…he said they were filming a scene and a guy came out on his porch and said, get out of here. Then Harmony Korine explained, we’re making a movie. Then the guy said, Oh, do you want me to turn my lights on to make it better for you? The movie looks like it is made guerrilla style running from place to place grabbing shots. His work isn’t for everyone. I wouldn’t say I understand or love, love, love his work like some people seem to but I appreciate what drives him to make movies and the unusual visual approach he has.

Crossroads of Youth
I greatly enjoyed the experience of seeing Crossroads of Youth. It is a 1934 Korean movie, silent, shown with live musicians including singers and a narrator. The print was decent for being so old. It is the oldest surviving Korean film. The story was timeless. It is about rites of passage, country life versus city life, the influence of Western culture, familial relationships and men being cads towards women. I wish the women in the film were less victimized. But they had strong characters. The narrator was funny. He put on a show. Even though he was narrating in Korean, his intonations were clear to all listening. The subtitles seemed updated for the times. For example they made reference to the lead actor’s exceptionally thickly drawn eyebrows. When the camera moved slowly down a woman’s body, the card read, “This camera-work is vulgar.” And there was a scene when a character was taking a sip of tea, the card read, the narrator will also take a sip of tea. What else stuck out…oh, a couple of the characters play golf. So Koreans started playing way back then.

Toy Story 3D
I love Toy Story and Toy Story 2. I can’t wait for Toy Story 3. I had a break in the film fest and got a chance to see the double feature 3D version this weekend. It was amazing. I loved the little beginning and the 10 minute intermission. I laughed at all the little things added for this special showing. The kids in the audience were cute. They seemed to stay focused and enjoy the movies.

Paris
I randomly went to see Paris. It was just okay. Paris looked beautiful. Some of the storylines were amusing and thought-provoking. Some were just too superficial to make a judgment about. There were many interesting characters but not enough time to develop all of them. It bugged me that twice the men acted like creeps and still won over their interests. Juliette Binoche is always interesting. The main idea of the movie is that Paris is a city with such history that people seem to take for granted and are easily forgetting. But some people value this history. Also, there are amazing developments in Paris and many people take these for granted while there are those who are full aware of the changes. It’s a love story about a great city. But overall, it was not as substantial as I would’ve liked. But as I used a free pass, it was painless. It had a fantastic look and like I said, some characters were appealing, funny and relatable. Some characters were introduced and forgotten. Some were just out of place. Still, I liked the adventure of just walking into a movie sight unseen. It is so rare for me to see a movie without knowing something about it beforehand.

So this upcoming week is a big NYAFF week. Next blog will be full of reviews!

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

  • Share/Save/Bookmark
|